CCSP Certification a Must for Security Pros Pivoting to the Cloud

Cloud computing is transforming the world of information technology before our eyes. Less than a decade ago, IT teams focused most of their time on building enterprise data centers, managing capacity and building custom applications.

Today, times have changed and many organizations are now shifting their focus toward the cloud, moving to a world where automation and integration dominate, and enterprises purchase much of their computing as a service from a number of different providers.

This shift toward the cloud doesn’t only change the world of developers and engineers, it also dramatically affects the work of information security professionals. In the world of cloud computing, assessments rise in importance and contract language becomes as significant a security control as the configuration of the enterprise firewall.

As security professionals seek to reinvent themselves as cloud security experts, they must gain new knowledge and skills and may wish to pursue professional certifications that help them demonstrate this aptitude to current and potential employers.

Security in the Cloud

Perhaps the most fundamental security difference between the old world of on-premises enterprise IT and the new world of cloud computing lies in the degree of dependence that organizations place in their vendors. Certainly, IT organizations have always relied upon vendors to provide hardware, software and services and those vendors have played a key role in enterprise security.

Even in a completely on-premises model, a security flaw in a vendor-supplied product can have dramatic security implications that open holes for an attacker to exploit. In a cloud model, those dependencies grow larger as organizations call upon vendors to provide services in a more active fashion.

The shared responsibility model is the key to understanding cloud computing security. Both vendors and their customers must take responsibility for different elements of security and that division of responsibility depends upon the scope of services provided by the vendor and the agreement between the vendor and its customers.

For example, an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) vendor offering virtualized servers to its customers is typically responsible for providing physical security in their data centers. The vendor is expected to manage network security, and secure both the hardware underlying the servers and the hypervisor that separates virtual instances from each other.

Customers configure the operating system, install applications, manage firewall rules and manipulate their own data. Therefore, the security of those components remains a customer responsibility.

In a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model, on the other hand, the burden of responsibility swings more heavily in the vendor’s direction. The vendor manages all of the servers as well as the application, assuming responsibility for almost the entire security stack. That said, customers may still manage application security settings and control the flow of sensitive information into the application.

As you move services to the cloud, the most important security concern you should have is a clear and documented understanding of the shared responsibility model. You should clearly articulate your security requirements, perhaps drawing this information from the requirements you use for on-premises environments.

Next, you should work with vendors to spell out the technical, physical and administrative controls that satisfy each objective and state who is responsible for the implementation, configuration, operation and verification of each control.

Preparing Yourself for the Cloud

It’s not just organizations that need to reinvent themselves for the cloud. It certainly is true that technologies and business processes will change as we move toward a cloud-centric computing environment.

Those changes will also require a shift in the individuals performing technology-related functions in those organizations, including information security. Current security professionals will need to update their skills to cover the emerging world of cloud computing.

In a cloud-focused world, security professionals must work closely with internal and external customers and suppliers to ensure that security follows the organization’s data wherever it flows or resides. Key skills for cloud security professionals include vendor relations, contract negotiations, security assessments, cloud platform operation and cloud application security.

In addition, cloud security professionals will need to have a deep understanding of the security services provided by their organization’s slate of cloud vendors, and understand how to manipulate those services to achieve the organization’s security goals.

If you’re hoping to reinvent your career as a cloud security specialist, then you may wish to consider earning a cloud-focused information security certification, such as the Certified Cloud Security Professional (CCSP) certification available as a joint partnership between (ISC)² and the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA).

These two organizations, known for providing some of the premier information security certifications available today, partnered to provide an advanced certification that requires a combination of advanced knowledge and practical, hands-on work experience that complements the other certifications they offer.

The Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) certification offered by (ISC)² is already considered the gold standard certification in the information security field. It covers an extremely broad range of material and only touches on cloud computing topics.

CISSP holders who wish to focus on cloud security may wish to supplement their existing certification with the CCSP as a specialized credential. The good news is that CISSPs already meet the CCSP’s five-year work experience requirement.

The Certificate of Cloud Security Knowledge (CCSK) certification offered by CSA is more of a foundational certification that focuses on a candidate’s mastery of the CSA’s cloud security guidance and has no work experience requirement.

Earning CCSK can smooth your path to CCSP by checking off a portion of the CCSP professional experience prerequisite. If you’re a practicing information security professional, you are probably better off earning the CCSP credential, either as a stand-alone certification or as a complement to the CISSP.

As enterprises continue to move applications, data and infrastructure to the cloud, they will increasingly require the services of information security professionals skilled in securing cloud computing environments.

Building out your skills in the realm of cloud computing and demonstrating those skills by earning the CCSP credential will position you well to take advantage of this trend and find interesting and lucrative employment opportunities.

Mike Chapple is Senior Director for IT Service Delivery at the University of Notre Dame. Mike is CISSP certified and holds bachelor’s and doctoral degrees in computer science and engineering from Notre Dame, with a master’s degree in computer science from the University of Idaho and an MBA from Auburn University.

[GoCertify]

M&A Due Diligence Must Include Cybersecurity Considerations

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are a regular occurrence in the business world. And while we’re all familiar with concept of due diligence when it comes to judging the financial performance of another company, it’s time for enterprises to start applying that same level of scrutiny to the cybersecurity capabilities of a potential acquisition. A thorough review of an acquisition’s security architecture, processes and policies should be a firm requirement for any M&A process.

But where should the cybersecurity due diligence process begin? As a CISO, I recommend that companies start by confirming their acquisition target’s past investments in cybersecurity were made in a manner commensurate with the growth of the company.  Ask the following:

  • Have baseline investments been made not just in detection controls but also in more proactive and preventative measures to protect data?
  • Have investments been made in ensuring that Information Security staff are on hand to support the management of risk?
  • Have non-IT employees gone through cybersecurity training?
  • Can acquirers establish with confidence that the company being assessed has not already been breached?

Due diligence should be maintained throughout the entire M&A process, particularly before information about the activity goes public. While I don’t have specific numbers, I think it’s safe to assume that there have been situations in which a hacker or less than scrupulous employee have hacked an enterprise network in search of material information they could exploit for their own financial gain before news of an M&A became public. The fallout of such activity could be extreme, so it’s important that acquirers and those looking to be acquired consider and implement the appropriate cybersecurity controls to ensure proprietary information doesn’t leak.

The constant stream of security breaches in the news have gained the attention of executive leadership and boards of directors who are now looking to their CSOs/CISOs to minimize their risk exposure when contemplating major business moves like an M&A.

I would encourage my fellow CISOs (or any other executive looking for guidance and recommendations around cybersecurity policy guidance) to visit SecurityRoundtable.org, a community designed to share best practices, use cases and expert advice to help executives better manage cybersecurity risk.

[Palo Alto Networks Research Center]

Dear CISOs and Legal Counsel: We Can’t Wait for the Privacy Regulators

Privacy is constantly in the news these days. Should Apple create a “back door” to unlock a terrorist’s iPhone for the FBI? Should Microsoft provide European citizen’s information stored on servers in Ireland in response to a US subpoena? Should data be allowed to be stored outside of Germany, France, Sweden and Russia for cloud services? Should we store information in the cloud without retaining the keys? Should commerce between the US and EU flow under the proposed replacement for Safe Harbor (Privacy Shield)? Or maybe the question is should someone be awarded tens of millions of dollars for having their privacy violated for filming them naked in a hotel room without their consent, or for filming someone’s engagement in a sex tape and releasing it to the Internet?

The Issue is Clear:  Why Should Anyone Trust Anyone?
We could leave this issue to privacy officers, internal and external legal counsel, governments, data protection authorities, politicians, regulators, and technology companies to sort out. We could wait for the ultimate answer to solve the privacy question once and for all. And wait. And wait some more. And wait for another review, debate, newsworthy event (such as needing information from another critical terrorist phone). Or wait for the next cloud service to be hacked, exposing photos that violate an individual’s right to privacy.

The reality is we just don’t trust each other—person to person or country to country. The reality is also, we have to trust each other at some level to interact personally or conduct business with each other.

As we grow up, we implicitly trust our parents to protect and lead us in the right direction. We have temporary moments of insanity during the ages of 5-6 and 13-17, where we don’t trust what they are telling us (because we just know better), and our parents all of a sudden get smarter when we turn about 22! In other words, we have temporary moments of disbelief, or a lack of trust in what they are telling us. It is the receiver of the message (in this case the child), that does not believe the sender (parents), even though thesender of the message was telling the truth and had good intentions all along. Trust is earned by delivering a consistent message that matches the real environment.

So what does this have to do with privacy in our organizations? Everything. We are currently in a state where people and governments are challenging the trust model. However, we cannot stop and wait for resolution of this temporary insanity and total lack of trust to figure out how to enable others to trust our assertions.

We Will Lose Valuable Time
We must, as “parents of our own organizational destiny,” continue to refine the controls on our systems and enhance how we protect information privacy. As we promote our message of information protection, those who make the rules will recognize that the organizations performing fundamental security work, building in privacy considerations and protecting rights through followed processes, will be able to be “trusted” and interact with other people and countries.

Privacy is much more than publishing a privacy notice on the company web site or sending out notices. Privacy is an organizational commitment to build trust by securing information and limiting access to accurate information to only those who have a right to it. Security officers are at the core of this issue and must be literate in the language to be effective.

At the 2016 North America CACS conference in New Orleans May 2-4, 2016, Todd Fitzgerald’s “One-Hour Privacy Primer” session will explore privacy concepts every security officer, privacy officer, auditor, lawyer, and governance professional should know:

  • The role of the CISO with respect to Privacy
  • 8 Universal (OECD) privacy principles
  • Global laws impacting privacy
  • Privacy by Design principles
  • Understanding data elements and the language of privacy

Todd Fitzgerald, CISA, CISM, CRISC, CISSP, CIPP/US, CIPP/E, CIPM, PMP, CGEIT, ISO27000, ITILv3f, Global Director Information Security, Grant Thornton International, Ltd.

[ISACA Now Blog]

Tech Docs: Get to Know PAN-OS 7.1

PAN-OS 7.1 is a milestone release, packed with features requested by you, our amazing customers!

http://researchcenter.paloaltonetworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/pan-os-71-docs-1.pdf

Get the Most out of the PAN-OS 7.1 Documentation

To find a complete list of features, we recommend that you start with the PAN-OS 7.1 Release Notes. The release notes also provide known issues, software compatibility information, and addressed issues.

For more in-depth feature coverage, check out our New Feature Guide for 7.1. This guide provides upgrade procedures, and describes all of the exciting new features introduced in PAN-OS 7.1 and how to configure them.

And finally, for complete workflows and best practices, check out our Administrator’s Guides forPAN-OS, Panorama, GlobalProtect, WildFire, Virtualization, and AutoFocus.

Or, if you prefer to search across the entire 7.1 documentation suite, select the 7.1 facet from the tech docs search page and enter an optional search term.

Revamped PAN-OS 7.1 XML API Usage Guide

Included with the PAN-OS 7.1 documentation is the revamped and enriched PAN-OS and Panorama XML API Usage Guide! To administer Panorama and to manage the Palo Alto Networks firewalls, use the guide to familiarize yourself with the XML API:

  • See how the API works: Learn how to structure and authenticate API requests. Use XML and XPath to target specific settings and actions.
  • Make your first API call: Get your API key and make a simple request to the PAN-OS XML API.
  • Explore the API: Look through the various ways you can construct your XML requests.
  • Behold the possibilities of the API: Walk through the primary use cases to accomplish tasks such as upgrading firewalls, managing GlobalProtect users, and querying multiple firewalls through Panorama, and then use the API innovatively for your needs.

Send Us Feedback

Have you used the PAN-OS XML API? Share how you use the XML API and we may feature your use case in an upcoming version of the PAN-OS XML API documentation.

Questions or Comments?

For questions or comments about new features in PAN-OS 7.1, contact your SE or account representative.

[Palo Alto Networks Research Center]

Do Labels Help in Security?

In the security industry, there has always been a want to use “best of breed” technology, which is about to be further amplified as the EU introduces the requirements around “state of the art” cybersecurity capabilities. As such we look to put products into categories, be they Sandbox, NGFW, UTM or Endpoint protection just to list a few.

The challenge comes, however, as technology providers look to differentiate themselves from their competitors. Each has additional capabilities or a different approach to solving the problem.

The Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Security Platform is variously mentioned, depending on the source, under all the categories of NGFW, sandbox with the WildFire service enabled, and has sometimes been called a UTM solution when you leverage multiple or all the services: WildFire, Threat Prevention, GlobalProtect, and URL Filtering.

But herein again lies the rub: What is a UTM solution? Most would typically consider it, as its name suggests, a collection of solutions aggregated into a single piece of hardware. The value in such instances is typically cost. From my time working in product management, the biggest overhead of such solutions was the management plane, which effectively becomes the baton manager ensuring traffic is passed from one process to the next to allow each to complete its specific tasks, effectively making the approach like a relay race. Typically they share a management dashboard or common interface.

Considering we strive now for “state of the art,” such linear processing is, in the modern world, relatively archaic. In recent months the impending era of quantum computing has been in the media. The idea of being able to break atoms down to the subatomic level, and then process them at far greater rates, seems like a principal that should be at the heart of a next-generation cybersecurity solution. Rather than analyzing characteristics linearly – as most UTMs would – and then requiring humans to do the computational physics, we should be parallel processing the subatomic elements to get to a more accurate outcome, more efficiently, today.

So why don’t we do this already? Well, whilst we aren’t yet using quantum mechanics, some solutions do look to take an evolutionary approach, changing the starting point of how we analyze the traffic, based on use rather than IP protocol pre-concepts, and then look to take a singular pass to complete multilayered analysis that has cross dependencies to provide a singular outcome. Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Security Platform strives to achieve this as it does allow, much like the quantum mechanics, a method to do far more in-depth analysis at greater speed that reduces the human physics involved, giving a more efficient and accurate answer. Does this make it a UTM? Palo Alto Networks would say “no”, as regards the expectations of what a UTM is; we would consider archaic linear analysis in the face of what we can actually do.

So do labels help in security?

At a high level, they give an understanding of the broad scope of technology capabilities; yet, as the saying goes, the devil is indeed in the details. A MINI and a Ferrari are both cars, yet each has very different capabilities. What’s important is that, when looking at technology capabilities, you consider which specific aspects are important to you under each broad label.

Today labels typically focus on capability groupings; but, what is becoming increasingly critical – be it driven by either EU legislation or the broader skills gap in the security industry – is usability. How many people or man-hours does it take to get to the answer? The “how” is as important, if not more important, than the “what”. Both a computer and a quantum computer would give you an answer to the meaning of life (which, of course, would be 42.) However the former could take decades and the later, milliseconds.

In an industry as dynamic as cyber, keeping pace with “state of the art” means security leaders must look beyond the “what” label and see the “how” value that comes especially in the context of each company’s broader cybersecurity eco-system. As technology and the threats against it continue to evolve, so too – I’m sure – will the labels applied by the industry against the cybersecurity tools we use evolve.

Now “best of breed” or “integrated solution”, that’s another debate that seems to have raged on for too long; however, that’s for another blog…

[Palo Alto Networks Research Center]

English
Exit mobile version