Can a CASB Protect You From the Treacherous 12?

Many frequently asked questions related to cloud security have included concerns about compliance and insider threats. But lately, a primary question is whether cloud services are falling victim to the same level of external attack as the data center. With Software as a Service (SaaS) becoming the new normal for the corporate workforce, and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) on the rise, cloud services now hold mission-critical enterprise data, intellectual property, and other valuable assets. As a result, the cloud is coming under attack, and it’s happening from both inside and outside the organization.

On February 29, the CSA Top Threats Working Group clarified the nature of cloud service attacks in areport titled, “The Treacherous 12: Cloud Computing Top Threats in 2016.” In this report the CSA concludes that although cloud services deliver business-supporting technology more efficiently than ever before, they also bring significant risk.

The CSA suggests that these risks occur in part because enterprise business units often acquire cloud services independently of the IT department, and often without regard for security. In addition, regardless of whether the IT department sanctions new cloud services, the door is wide open for the Treacherous 12.

Because all cloud services (sanctioned or not) present risks, the CSA points out that businesses need to take security policies, processes, and best practices into account. That makes sense, but is it enough?

Gartner predicts that through 2020, 95 percent of cloud security failures will be the customer’s fault. This does not necessarily mean that customers lack security expertise. What it does mean, though, is that it’s no longer sufficient to know how to make decisions about risk mitigation in the cloud. To reliably address cloud security, automation will be key.

Cloud security automation is where Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) come into play. A CASB can help automate visibility, compliance, data security, and threat protection for cloud services. We thought it would be interesting to take a look at how well CASBs in general would fare at helping enterprises survive the treacherous 12.

The good news is that CASBs clearly address nine of the treacherous 12 (along with many other risks not mentioned in the report). These include:

#1 Data breach
#2 Weak ID, credential, and access management
#3 Insecure APIs
#4 System and application vulnerabilities
#5 Account hijacking
#6 Malicious insiders
#7 Advanced persistent threats
#10 Abuse and nefarious use of cloud services
#12 Shared technology issues

There are countless examples of why being protected against the treacherous 12 is important. Some of the more high profile ones:

  • Data breach: In the 2015 Anthem breach, hackers used a third-party cloud service to steal over 80M customer credentials.
  • Insecure APIs: The mid-2015 IRS breach exposed over 300K records. While that’s a big number, the more interesting one is that it only took 1 vulnerable API to allow the breach to happen.
  • Malicious Insiders: Uber reported that their main database was improperly accessed. The unauthorized individual downloaded 50K names and numbers to a cloud service. Was it their former employee, the current Lyft CTO? That was Uber’s opinion. The DOJ disagreed and a lawsuit ensued.

In each of these cases a CASB could have helped. A CASB can help detect data breaches by monitoring privileged users, encryption policies, and movement of sensitive data. A CASB can also detect unusual activity within cloud services that originate from API calls, and support risk scoring of external APIs and applications based on the activity. And a CASB can spot malicious insiders by monitoring for overly-privileged user accounts as well as user profiles, roles, and privileges that drift from compliant baselines. Finally, a CASB can detect malicious user activity through user behavior analytics.

What about the three threats that aren’t covered by a CASB? Those include:

#8 Data loss
#9 Insufficient due diligence
#11 Denial of services

The cost of data loss (#8, above) is huge. A now-defunct company named Code Spaces had to close down when their corporate assets were destroyed, because it did not follow best practices for business continuity and disaster recovery. Data loss prevention is a primary corporate responsibility, and a CASB can’t detect whether it is in place. Insufficient due diligence (#9) is the responsibility of the organization leveraging the cloud service, not the service provider. Executives need a good roadmap and checklist for due diligence. A CASB can provide advice, but they don’t automate the process. Finally, denial of service (DoS, #11, above) attacks are intended to take the provider down. It is the provider’s responsibility to take precautions to mitigate DoS attacks.

For a quick reference guide to the question, “Can a CASB protect you from the 2016 treacherous 12?,” download this infographic.

To learn more, join Palerra CTO Ganesh Kirti and CSA Executive VP of Research J.R. Santos as they discuss “CASBs and the Treacherous 12 Top Cloud Threats” on April 25, 2-3pm EDT. Register for the webinar now.

Ganesh Kirti, Founder and CTO, Palerra

[Cloud Security Alliance Blog]

Cloud Security Alliance Announces Speakers and Presentations for Upcoming SecureCloud 2016 Conference

Leaders from Intel, Microsoft, Forrester Research and NIST Among Presenters at Upcoming Premiere European Cloud Security Event

DUBLIN, IRELAND – April 25, 2016 – The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), in collaboration withFraunhofer FOKUS and ENISA, today announced the presentations and speaker line up for the upcoming SecureCloud conference. The SecureCloud 2016 conference is scheduled for May 24 – 25 at Aviva Stadium in Dublin, Ireland. SecureCloud is the only European conference focused exclusively on cloud security and aims to provide an opportunity for government experts, industry experts, and corporate decision makers to discuss and exchange ideas about how to shape the future of cloud computing security.

“Even with all the awareness of the benefits of cloud technology, an overwhelming number of companies still have concerns about security, privacy and data management in the cloud and conferences such as this one are an important forum to address, discuss and resolve these concerns,” said Daniele Catteddu, Chief Technology Officer of the CSA. “SecureCloud will bring together some of the cloud industry’s top experts and thought leaders and we expect that it will draw substantial interest from the industry. We anticipate that this year’s event will further grow this body of knowledge and help us achieve a more trusted and secure cloud environment.”

An initial line up of featured speakers include:

  • “Securing the Cloud of Tomorrow” by Raj Samani, VP and CTO for Intel Security
  • “Privacy & Security in the Cloud: Customer Rights and Governments’ Lawful Access to Data” by John Frank, Vice President, EU Government Affairs at Microsoft
  • “Understanding the Crux – Abuse of Cloud Storage Services for Targeted Cyber Attacks” by Aditya K. Sood, Director of Security and Cloud Threat Labs at Elastica.
  • “Flying Through a Cloudy Sky” by Michaela Iorga, Senior Security Technical Lead for Cloud Computing at NIST.

Additional featured presentations will also be given by Laura Koetzle, Vice President and General Manager‬, Forrester Research; Vinay Patel, Global Head of Information Security Risk Management at Citi Technology Infrastructure; Dr. Kuan Hon, Senior Researcher at QML, Nathaly Rey, EMEA Trust Manager, Google for Work, EMC and Jim Reavis, Co-founder and CEO of the CSA.

This year’s event will also include a number of key panel presentations focused on some of the most emerging trends and issues in cloud computing including:

  • “Cloud Computing Compliance Controls Catalog (C5)” by Information Security Expert Patrick Grete, Clemens Doubrava of Bristish Standards Institute (BSI) and Charles Schulz of Agence nationale de sécurité des systèmes d’information (ANSSI)
  • “Financial Services in the Cloud” by Craig Balding of Barclays, Mario Maawad of Caixa Bank and Douglas Taylor of Citi

For more information on SecureCloud 2016, including registration details and schedule, please visithttps://csacongress.org/event/securecloud-2016/

Media Contact

Kari Walker for the CSA
kari@zagcommunications.com
703.928.9996

[Cloud Security Alliance Research News]

Palo Alto Networks Named Best Place to Work in Silicon Valley

Last week, the San Francisco Business Times announced their annual list of the best places to work in Silicon Valley. We are thrilled and honored to see Palo Alto Networks at the very top of this year’s list!  

Palo Alto Networks is a special place, and for many of us it’s by far the best place we have ever worked. Take a look at our People of Palo Alto Networks video series to see some of the reasons why our company means so much to us. Our highly collaborative culture allows us to work together and learn together.  We delegate decision making and let us have ownership over our work.  We value self-awareness and have a learning mindset, in which we recognize our strengths and weaknesses and continually strive to improve. In other words, a culture without egos and without walls.

Thank you to the San Francisco Business Times and to our employees who ensure our culture is the magic in our work environment. This is an extraordinary company made up of extraordinary people, and it’s an honor to work with everyone here. Go Palo Alto Networks!

If you’d like to learn more about opportunities for joining this great team, I invite you to visit ourCareers page.

[Palo Alto Networks Research Center]

Watch: CEO Mark McLaughlin On Making Successful Breaches More Difficult for Attackers

Last week at the Joint Service Academy Cybersecurity Summit at the United States Military Academy in West Point, Palo Alto Networks President and CEO Mark McLaughlin spoke with Fox Business Network correspondent Jo Ling Kent about ongoing efforts to improve cybersecurity.

Mark homed in on three things organizations can do to achieve the end goal of raising the cost of a successful attack, and making it successful breaches more difficult for attackers:

  1. Have a breach prevention mindset
  2. Make sure to share threat intelligence
  3. Continually educate the public on cybersecurity and good cyber hygiene

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/video-embed.html?video_id=4857870477001&loc=researchcenter.paloaltonetworks.com&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fresearchcenter.paloaltonetworks.com%2F2016%2F04%2Fwatch-ceo-mark-mclaughlin-on-making-successful-breaches-more-difficult-for-attackers%2F&_xcf=

The Summit is an invitation-only gathering of service academy graduates serving in critical leadership roles and select thought leaders from industry, government and academia that comes together to strengthen ties between industry and government, share best practices to secure the internet and defeat cyberthreats.

[Palo Alto Networks Research Center]

Board Involvement With IT Governance

Interest in IT governance is increasing due to the changing role and relevance of IT within organizations for supporting, sustaining and expanding business. According to the IT Governance Institute, IT governance is the form of leadership, organizational structures and processes that ensure an organization’s IT sustains and extends the organization’s strategies and objectives. While management’s role in IT governance is imperative, practitioners and academics have also long advocated board involvement in IT governance. However, the literature shows that boards may not be very involved in IT governance. This could be because board members may not have the needed IT expertise to provide direction on important operational and strategic IT-related issues. Boards may also not be very involved because IT does not get put on the board’s agenda or board members simply do not understand their roles regarding IT governance.

Our recent Journal article addresses this issue of the board’s role in IT governance by examining the charters of board-level IT committees. We reviewed the committee charters to analyze the prescribed roles and responsibilities of these committees. If the charters are not clear or complete, board members may misunderstand their roles. We found that only 23 Fortune 500 companies had board-level IT committees at the time of our study. We used content analysis to categorize the documented roles and responsibilities according to the 5 IT governance domains:  strategic alignment, value delivery, resource management, risk management and performance measurement. Our Journal article contains our findings and discusses the opportunities for these committees to improve their governance roles.

A topic that we are interested in beyond the scope of our article is the IT auditor’s role in ensuring the effectiveness of these committees or the board at large in terms of IT governance. During an IT governance audit, the auditor should examine the committee charters to ensure committees are set up to fulfill best practices and COBIT-related IT governance roles. Examining meeting minutes and matching them to the prescribed roles could further ensure these committees are effective in their oversight role. In fact, IT-related issues may be discussed and documented in board meeting minutes regardless of whether the company has a specifically designated board-level IT committee. We hope to explore some of these issues in the future.

Read Nancy Lankton and Jean Price’s recent Journal article:
“Board-level Information Technology Committees,” ISACA Journal, volume 2, 2016.

Nancy Lankton, CISA, CPA, and Jean Price

[ISACA Journal Author Blog]

English
Exit mobile version