Palo Alto Networks 2015 Predictions: Tailored Threat Intelligence

As 2014 comes to a close, our subject matter experts check in on what they see as major topics and trends for the new year. (You can read all of our 2015 predictions content here.)

Reading the collective tealeaves for adversaries 12 months from now is almost always a losing proposition. You are essentially trying to predict the tools, tactics and techniques that are going to be employed by incredibly skilled and intelligent attackers. Yes, we know more data breaches will occur, more records will be stolen, new technologies will be exploited, and more malware will be created than has ever been seen before. These are all givens in today’s threat landscape—the bad guys are out there, getting more efficient at their jobs, and constantly evolving.

The question becomes, what can we do about this in 2015? Here’s how I see it:

1. The year big data security analytics goes mainstream.

For advanced threats, the problem has always been attempting to find the small indicators that could reveal an attack. Many have tried to bring together enough intelligence, horsepower and analysis to find these “needles in a haystack,” but it hasn’t been enough. While there have been hints of success, applying big data analytics techniques to security will come into its own in 2015. We have hit the inflection point where computing power, availability of data, analytic models and most importantly the willingness and drive to see them through are here. We will see massive advances this coming year in our ability to collect, analyses, search, correlate, visualize and turn data into actionable security intelligence.

2. Tailored threat intelligence.

Increasingly, sophisticated organizations are realizing that certain types of attacks, or certain groups of attackers come after them. For example, there are certain steps an adversary will take to compromise a retail companies’ Point of Sale (POS) systems versus an entertainment organization’s databases, or the customer records at a major hospital. The motivations are different, the exploits and malware unique, and the methods change in each case. 2015 will be a banner year for profiling how attacks differ by industry, which vectors are higher risk for individual organizations, and tailoring custom protections in each case.

3. Sharing security intelligence.

Many major enterprises have learned the critical importance of sharing intelligence about the current state of the threat landscape – such as those in organizations like the FS-ISAC. Everyone benefits from information shared by one member, and collective immunity can be developed, stopping advanced attacks before they can compromise multiple organizations. This coming year will represent widespread adoption and acceptance of information sharing. The days of “holding it close” are over – the volume and sophistication of attacks requires a joint response.

A common theme runs through my thoughts on 2015: making better use of the data we have. Whether it is better algorithms to predict the next attack, understanding your risk posture, or sharing what you know with others – intelligence is key. Turning the massive churn of data enterprise organizations see each day into actionable intelligence, automatically, will be a major theme for 2015.

 

Threat intelligence is among many industry-specific topics planned for Ignite 2015, where you will tackle your toughest security challenges, get your hands dirty in one of our workshops, and expand your threat IQ. Register now to join us March 30-April 1, 2015 in Las Vegas — the best security conference you’ll attend all year.

 [Palo Alto Networks Blog]

 

Palo Alto Networks 2015 Predictions: Datacenter

As 2014 comes to a close, our subject matter experts check in on what they see as major topics and trends for the new year. (You can read all of our 2015 predictions content here.)

 

1. Cloud security will become less cloudy

It’s amazing how fast things change. It was not that long ago that cloud computing skeptics said that no one will use the cloud for business applications because of the security issues. Now we hear from customers that they are moving entire datacenters – not just select applications – to the cloud. Why? Ubiquity is one reason. Reduced costs are another. Finally, they are realizing that security — specifically next-generation security — can be used to protect their applications and data from advanced cyber attacks. But traditional, port-based security technologies cannot exert the same levels of control.

With the recent release of our VM-Series for both Amazon Web Services and KVM joining Citrix SDX and VMware ESXi and NSX support, 2015 will be the year that customers can protect their public, private or hybrid cloud-based applications using the next-generation firewall and advanced threat prevention features found in our enterprise security platform. Further clarifying cloud security will be the elimination of the time-lag between virtual machine provisioning and security deployment through the use of native automation features such as VM-monitoring, dynamic address groups and the XML API.

2. The benefits of network segmentation based on Zero Trust will be realized

During a recent customer visit, a tenured networking professional challenged our discussion around network segmentation based on Zero Trust principles, stating he had been segmenting the network for security for years. “So what’s new here?” he asked. Conceptually there is nothing new here; rudimentary network segmentation can be done by routers, switches and even firewalls. The key difference is in the level of granularity by which we can segment the network.

The rash of recent high profile breaches — where attackers hide in plain sight on the network — points to the need for segmentation principles that are more advanced than mere port, protocol or subnet. As the conversation with this networking professional continued, I pointed out that with the application identity, a view into the content and knowledge of who the user is, we can segment business critical data and applications in a far more granular fashion than rudimentary segmentation would allow.

Specifically, we can verify the identity of specific business applications, forcing its use over standard ports and validating the user identity. We can find and block rogue or misconfigured applications — all the while inspecting the application flow for file types, and blocking both known and unknown threats. In 2015, I expect to see many organizations continue to re-think how they are segmenting their network and applying Zero Trust principles of Never Trust – Always Verify using the application, the respective content and the user as the basis for policy enforcement. The benefits our customers will begin to realize include improved security posture with less administrative effort.

3. 2015: The year of focus

According to IDTheftCenter.Org, 2014 had, as of Dec 2, 708 data breaches resulting in the loss of more than 81 million records. That represents data from roughly 25 percent of the U.S. population and the year isn’t even over. So in the spirit of Christmas, my last forward looking 2015 entry isn’t a prediction but a wish. While I don’t believe we will ever know the details behind the 700+ breaches, it’s safe to say that there were multiple steps along the way where someone could have said, “We could have been more focused here.” My 2015 wish is that users, netsec professionals and executives all become more focused on their respective network security responsibilities.

  • Users: Focus on the fact that you are integral to network security – even though you may not see yourself as an attack target, you can easily be an attack entry point. So here are some simple steps to lessen that risk. Count to five and think about the link you are clicking on. Look closely at it, and if you have doubts, don’t click. Say yes to your software (e.g., IE, Adobe, Firefox, etc.) updates as they often times include patches to vulnerability exploits — aka attack vectors. Lastly, think about what you do on your company network this way. It’s your benefits, payroll, and other personal data that are at risk, not just the company’s data.
  • Netsec professionals: I wish you had more time, but I’m a realist. My wish for you all is that you be more focused (than you already are) on things that appear out of the norm: strange traffic patterns or application usage in the datacenter, odd outbound behavior around the use of RDP, SSH or TeamViewer, odd data or application access requests. What we do know about many of these attacks is that the activity was hiding in plain sight using common applications – focus and vigilance may help us stop the progress of these attackers.
  • Executives: 2014 showed that not only your company reputation, but also your career is on the line. In 2015 you should focus on becoming more knowledgeable about your data. Where is it stored? Where it is going on the network? Is encryption in use? What SLAs are in place if it is stored externally? With that information in hand, ask your brightest netsec minds what else can you do to protect the data.

 

Datacenter security is among many industry-specific topics planned for Ignite 2015, where you will tackle your toughest security challenges, get your hands dirty in one of our workshops, and expand your threat IQ. Register now to join us March 30-April 1, 2015 in Las Vegas — the best security conference you’ll attend all year.

 [Palo Alto Networks Blog]

 

Keeping Up with Emerging Technologies Amidst Legislative Lag

Government organizations, such as the US Congress, can be a bit slow on the uptake, taking decades to recognize new technology and adjust our laws accordingly. For industries that deal with sensitive data, however, relying on legislative lag can lead to a false sense of security. Governments around the world have grown wise to the rapid pace of technological development, and the law is prepared to incorporate new technology as it is developed.

Some of the biggest challenges faced by businesses that handle sensitive personal data are best practices laws. Best practices laws demand a constant awareness of current and new technology and its potential impact on a client’s business practices. Depending on your field, privacy laws and regulations are often so vague that “best practices” just means the most conservative practices you can design, including a good insurance policy.

Contractual obligations are another challenging part of maintaining sensitive data. Businesses and governments frequently mandate data protection via contracts. The European Union (EU) recommends contractual clauses designed to export its privacy regulations to foreign businesses dealing with companies from the EU. Banks, insurers and other large corporations often maximize their protection by demanding “all reasonable protections,” “the utmost care” and other vague statements that seem more concerned with shifting liability to their contractual partner than actually protecting sensitive data.

Employing best practices and fulfilling vague contractual obligations requires an understanding of technology that is still in development. Early adopters of encryption no longer rely on DES and other outdated standards, depending instead on expert consultants who apprise them of improvements and new standards. These experts now regularly advise on more modern technologies and practices, such as AES in encryption, FPE in tokenization, multi-layered privacy design and merging of access identity management practices with encryption and de-identification policies. Although not all of these technologies are relevant to all businesses, some are mandated or recommended, and others become relevant due to vague regulations or contractual obligations. The need for technological mobility, flexibility and increased performance requires more points of access and greater protection, in turn leading to bottlenecks and runaway costs. Thus, both profit and compliance demand fast adoption of emerging technologies.

Your client’s cybersecurity obligations must also be balanced with its duties under transparency laws and regulations. Transparency and privacy have always been in conflict. Today, we see evidence of the privacy/transparency conflict in arguments over making health data available to researchers, censoring internet search results in the name of privacy and, of course, the ongoingpublic debate about mass surveillance. You know your client’s current transparency obligations, but how can you prepare them for the future without further sacrificing data security? Developments in the EU offer a good insight into a difficult new reality, one where the privacy concerns of the past are swept under the rug every time a new technology promises to minimize the privacy impact of new transparency rules. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently mandated increased transparency of clinical research data—requiring researchers and companies to share sensitive data among themselves while necessarily mitigating the risks of a data breach. Even businesses have joined the fight, with Google and BBC both planning to undermine the EU’s “Right to be Forgotten” ruling via new transparency reports.

The US has already begun debating the merits of copying the EU’s rules, and American corporations are preparing themselves for the changes around the corner—and confronting the ones that are already here. We all balance priorities in constant conflict: compliance, maintaining consumer confidence and generating a profit. Governments know that new technology is the primary force shaping this balance, and the onus is on businesses to make sure they keep up.

Harris Buller, Attorney, HushHush

Virginia Mushkatblat, Founder of HushHush

[ISACA]

English
Exit mobile version